It is suggested that to make everyone free from the public transport's fee, the government should provided all the funding. I do not advocate this notion as the government should not only put their concern on transportation sector but also the other essential fields such as health, education, and economics development.
Providing free public transportation facilities evidently can increase the peoples willingness to leave their private vehicles. In consequence, we can improve the traffic issue and reduce environmental issues such as air pollution. Beside that, the level of car accidents will also drop significantly. However, freeing public transportation fee cost a lot of money because we should fulfill the price in maintenance, employees' salary, and electrical need continuously. As a result, the fund allocated for other essentials sectors will be impacted.
The sectors that will be affected above is health, education, and economics development. For instance, in health, the government funding for increasing the quality of public hospitals will be reduced. Therefore, it can affect the morbidity and mortality rates of the country. Additionally, in education fields, if the funding for developing schools facilities and literature is cut, our child will can not receive better quality of education that surely affect the future human quality of the nation. Finally, in economic development sector, if the budget in helping public companies is diminished, there will be a lot of bankrupt companies that long-termly created high number of unemployed people.
To sum up, public transport cost should not be fully funded by the government because balancing budget for other vital sectors is compulsory considered.
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The tables show results of 2 surveys done in 1980 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city Units are measured in percentage Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 73
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 67
- the graph below gives information about US government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...n facilities evidently can increase the peoples willingness to leave their private vehi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vital sectors is compulsory considered.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61450381679 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08793722916 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583969465649 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6596701584 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.153846154 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322329195143 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115817396953 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766804550793 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207161804671 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273917316415 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.