Q10 Development in technology causes environmental problems Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life while others say that technology can solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Q10 !: Development in technology causes environmental problems. Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life, while others say that technology can solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Recently, the question of how to deal with environmental issues has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that the development of technology enables humans to handle environmental problems, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stand. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.

​On the one hand, those who claim that having a simpler way of life alleviates the level of environmental concerns do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that with the advent of personal vehicles, a multitude of people own cars, operated by fossil fuel, emitting a huge amount of carbon dioxide, which leads to air pollution as well as climate change. This exerts a detrimental influence on the quality of people's life. In addition, numerous goods made of plastic that is non-disposable are used by a multitude of people pursuing conveniences, posing a threat to the environment. Given these points, some people hold the view that changing our lifestyle into a simpler way, such as avoiding using plastic bags and commuting to and from work by public transport makes it possible for mankind to ease these environmental problems.

​My opinion, however, is that human beings should make use of technology in order to resolve contemporary issues related to the environment. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that in this technologically advanced era, a great number of large companies invest vast sums of money in developing the way to utilise renewable energy, including electricity, lessening environmental degradation. As a brief illustration, Tesla, which is the most notable firm in the field of the automobile industry could release cars using electricity as an energy source in the market owing to the advancement of technology. These cars are able to ameliorate the quality of air given that they do not generate CO2. Furthermore, the majority of developed countries across the globe have a predisposition to convert thermal power stations into other plants that are run by green energy sources, such as wind power and solar power with the help of technological progress. To be specific, up-to-date technology allows nations to withhold enough energy for supporting country's industry sectors. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.

​In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that forcing humans to have a simple lifestyle to tackle environmental issues should be discouraged as developments in technology can help people devise solutions to these problems for the reasons discussed above.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-08 idid382021 89 view
2022-08-07 idid382021 89 view
2022-08-06 idid382021 89 view
2022-08-03 hellielts 89 view
2021-10-21 haohao 73 view
Essays by user idid382004 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that forcing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33485193622 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02935755172 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599088838269 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.0909119783 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.111111111 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29268494817 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754528178403 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634049314221 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170744447096 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352509877137 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.