Q 13: The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalisation produces positive effects for everyone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, whether an increase in the number of international businesses in the era of globalisation has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that globalisation exerts a positive influence on human beings, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from the growth of global corporations. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that international firms which have established branches in local countries can stimulate economic success in these nations considering that global companies create a myriad employment opportunities, allowing local residents to land a job with greater ease. Furthermore, from the customers' perspective of view, they can be provided with more choices. This means that they can buy global products, making it possible for them to have an improved standard of living.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that the globalisation trend merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that local countries can suffer from brain drain as the majority of multinational firms have a predisposition to hire locals by providing higher wages as well as more perks than local companies, leading them to have difficulty finding competent job seekers. In addition, some international corporations are inclined to enter local markets without taking into account local environments related to the business. As a result, they often give rise to cultural conflicts since some of them do not take responsibility for respecting local cultures as well as policies. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-25 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | idid382002 | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | idid382003 | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-22 | idid382004 | 11 | view |
- Q4 Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q8 As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 89
- Q2 Some people believe famous people s support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems while others think celebrities make the problems less important Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Q7 Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q 13 The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalisation produces positive effects for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...ith greater ease. Furthermore, from the customers perspective of view, they can be provid...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38138138138 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04946933534 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603603603604 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0204414598 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.466666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0647662418657 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207085498191 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265421206565 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0360377822766 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027234527875 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.