Q3. Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the protection of animals and plants has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that if human beings make an effort, they can prevent living creatures, including animals and plants, from disappearing, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that humans cannot make it possible numerous species of animals and plants not to become extinct do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that human beings have exploited a myriad of natural habitats without taking into account environmental degradation, posing a threat to both animals and plants. As an illustration, a natural heritage site designated by UNESCO in South Korea had various species of endangered birds in 2010. However, according to an article released by the Seoul Times, approximately 70% of these species died out in 2015, and it turned out that the main reason for this phenomenon was an astronomical amount of garbage generated by tourists which took a heavy toll on the local environment.
My opinion, however, is that mankind is capable of keeping biodiversity. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that not only do governments across the globe invest a vast sum of money in dealing with global warming, accelerating the speed of climate change, that exerts a detrimental influence on animals and plants, but they are also implementing a huge number of campaigns to warn of the dangers of the extinction of living creatures, such as wildlife and plants, which helps to raise awareness amongst the public. In addition, individuals can play a vital role in the preservation of animals and plants. To provide a hypothetical example, If a multitude of ordinary people participated in recycling, a large quantity of waste doing harm to the quality of life of animals and plants would be reduced, enabling them to live a better life. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that if every sector of our society makes a concerted effort, humans are capable of conserving animals and plants for the reasons discussed above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that if every...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1272264631 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88027674832 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600508905852 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.314200166 49.4020404114 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23156889768 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682462183821 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510638805451 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139045957941 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355743459646 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.