Q4 Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the impact of social media on individual people as well as society has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that humans and society are negatively affected by social networking services, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from developments in social platforms. Perhaps the principal advantage is that the advent of social media has revolutionised the way people communicate with one another regardless of time and place. To be more specific, users are capable of sending messages to their acquaintances anywhere and at any time through social networking services, such as Facebook and Instagram, enabling them to build strong relationships with each other. In addition, people are able to share their common interests with their friends and family members on social networking sites, which makes it possible for them to enhance their bonds. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for the claim that the introduction of social media impacts on the public in a positive way.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that the advancement of social networking services merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that teenagers who are generally less likely to distinguish right from wrong are vulnerable to become exposed to crimes given that offenders are capable of targeting them by creating numerous fake profile with greater ease. This can even lead to an increase in abduction, doing harm to society. Furthermore, those who lack self-control can easily become addicted to social media. Excessive use of social networking services can prevent employees and students from concentrating on their work or studies, which can even exert a detrimental influence on their academic or work performance. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 862, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n of social media impacts on the public in a positive way. On the other hand, it seems short-s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 830, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he above, I also find these persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25984251969 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84006481122 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569553805774 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8797966184 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.882352941 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4117647059 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159255055181 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524563211694 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616973875895 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966803679034 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082831716377 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.