Q6: Some people prefer to have temporary jobs which means that they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of time to do what they want What is your opinion.
Recently, types of employment have become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that working as a temporary worker allows people to live a better life, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from landing a part-time job. Perhaps the principal benefit is that temporary employees are less likely to suffer from high levels of stress given that they are able to quit their occupations with greater ease. In addition, the majority of companies have a predisposition not to force part-time working adults to have a tight grasp of their duties, making it possible for them to have an improved standard of living. This is because businesses considering these adults can be replaced with permanent employees at any time.
On the one hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that working temporarily merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that part-time workers often have difficulty building successful work experience that will be invaluable in their future careers. As an illustration, according to an article released by the Seoul Times, approximately 70% of part-time working people failed to find permanent employment opportunities in 2010. In fact, it turned out that the main reason for this phenomenon was their part-time work experience that exerted a negative influence on job interviewers. Furthermore, a multitude of temporary workers struggle to support living costs considering that the average wage of part-timers is much lower than that of full-timers. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | phuonghangncqvbn | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | idid382003 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-04 | idid382003 | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | idid382003 | 84 | view |
- Q15 Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Q15 Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Q2 Some people believe famous people s support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems Others think celebrities make the problems less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Q3 Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give 89
- Q5 It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet TO what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2776119403 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93380448095 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588059701493 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5823938764 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146407433293 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429824999455 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366246663098 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805492388659 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370216737787 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.