Q6 : Some people prefer to have temporary jobs, which means they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of the time to do what they want. What is your opinion?
Recently, the types of employment has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that landing a part-time occupation is beneficial, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from working as a part-timer. Perhaps the principal benefit is that temporary workers are less likely to experience high levels of stress given that temporary employees are capable of quitting their occupations with greater ease. Another advantage is that part-timers do not need to have a tight grasp of their duties related to work, which enables them to have a better quality of life. This is partly because the majority of companies have a predisposition not to expect temporary working people to have a deeper understanding of business since the firms consider them to be replaced by permanent employees at any time.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that finding part-time employment opportunities merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that a multitude of part-timers have difficulty building work experience that will be invaluable in their future careers, which can even prevent them from finding a permanent occupation. To exemplify, according to an article released by the Seoul times, approximately 70% of previous temporary workers failed to acquire a full-time job in the year 2015. In fact, it turned out that the main reason for this phenomenon was their temporary work experience exerted a negative influence on job interviewers. Furthermore, a myraid of part-timers are struggling to support their own living costs considering that the average wage of temporary working people is much lower than that of full-timers. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced by permanent employees at any time. On the other hand, it seems short-sighte...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 931, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he above, I also find these persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27071823204 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97390541671 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580110497238 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3448192103 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152175023518 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460177426009 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409892710618 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807995926123 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498415495772 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.