Q8 As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment.
Recently, an increase in the number of personal vehicles has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that although there are some disadvantages to more people purchasing and utilising private vehicles for the environment, there are exceeded by the advantages for everyday people, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that a rise in the number of cars poses a threat to the environment do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that a huge amount of CO2 emitted by private vehicles causes air pollution that does harm to people's mental and physical health. In addition, an astronomical quantity of carbon dioxide released by cars accelerates the speed of global warming resulting in climate change, which prevents living creatures, including numerous endangered species of animals and plants that should be protected in order to keep biodiversity, from living a longer life.
My opinion, however, is that mankind can reap a myraid of advantages from the availability of personal vehicles. Perhaps the principal advantage is that owning a car enables individual people to facilitate various aspects of their daily lives, from commuting to and from work to buying groceries. To be more specific, car users are able to travel to their workplaces with greater ease given that passengers of public transport often spend a great deal of time travelling to work. This is mainly because buses and metros are often too crowded and are sometimes unavailable. Furthermore, those who possess their own cars are capable of taking trips in a convenient way since they do not need to take into account problems related to public transportation systems, such as being limited to fixed routes and timetables. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the benefits of making use of cars for humans surpass the drawbacks for the environment for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | minhquanvn | 78 | view |
- Q22 Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Q20 Over the last few decades there has been an increase in international tourism Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q More and more children are accessing the Internet unsupervised This can sometimes put them at risk What problems do you think parents face when dealing with their children using the Internet How can this problem be solved 73
- Q13 Many people are busy with work and do not have enough time to spend with family and friends Why does this happen What are the effects of this on family life and society as a whole 84
- X 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a convenient way" with adverb for "convenient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ir own cars are capable of taking trips in a convenient way since they do not need to take into acc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18206521739 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83264159404 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4727765154 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.133333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305512084667 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772228124832 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740399813316 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161835369584 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414946430409 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.