Q8 As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment.
Recently, an increase in the number of personal vehicles has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that although there are some disadvantages to a rise in the number of private vehicles for individual people, these are exceeded by the disadvantages for the environment, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that a myriad of people purchasing cars pose a threat to the environment do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that a huge amount of CO2 released by cars leads to air pollution doing harm to people's well-being and mental health. In addition, not only does an astronomical quantity of carbon dioxide emitted by personal vehicles accelerate the speed of global warming giving rise to climate change, but it also exerts a detrimental influence on numerous endangered species of animals and plants that play a vital role in keeping biodiversity.
My opinion, however, is that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from the availability of cars. Perhaps the principal benefit is that the use of cars can facilitate various aspects of people's daily lives, from commuting to and from work to purchasing groceries. To be more specific, car users are capable of driving to work with greater ease given that passengers of public transport often spend a huge amount of time travelling to their workplaces. This is because buses and metros are often crowded and are sometimes unavailable. Furthermore, personal vehicles make it possible for tourists to take trips in a convenient way since travellers do not need to worry about problems related to public transport systems, such as being limited to fixed routes and timetables. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the benefits of a climb in the number of personal vehicles for everyday people surpass the drawbacks for the environment for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | minhquanvn | 78 | view |
- X 89
- Q11 Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- X 78
- Q6 Some people prefer to have temporary jobs which means they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of the time to do what they want What is your opinion 84
- Q18 Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development Some people think that financial aid is important Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important Discuss both these 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...rs leads to air pollution doing harm to peoples well-being and mental health. In additi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a convenient way" with adverb for "convenient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... it possible for tourists to take trips in a convenient way since travellers do not need to worry a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11081081081 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87050566551 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.377834213 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.066666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249078674238 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687127713326 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620720577415 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14219226854 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260199381826 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.