Q9 : A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. What do you think?
Recently, the issue of animal use has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that animals should be used to meet our needs, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from the use of animals. Perhaps the principal benefit is that livestock can provide essential nutrients, such as protein, allowing people to lead a healthy life. Furthermore, cures for various illnesses have been developed by performing testing on animals, which exerts a positive influence on the quality of life of mankind. To exemplify, one recent study conducted by Seoul National University has demonstrated that scientists have been able to develop treatments for heart disease by conducting experiments on pigs. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for the claim that animal use is necessary.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that animal use can be justified. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that animal experimentation often infringes animal rights considering that it inflicts suffering on animals. To be more specific, animal testing often poses a threat to animals' physical and mental health since the majority of experiments are undertaken in barbaric ways. In addition, there is a possibility of catastrophic dangers, which humans can face, arising from animal experiments. This means that a multitude of genetic features of animals are different from those of humans. Thus, some results of animal experimentation can not guarantee that these fully apply to human beings. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2426035503 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87176777844 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1666251453 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279932713109 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815577520237 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689679424843 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148022771312 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849206439159 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.