The debate over the governments divert a host of time and money to conservation of wild animals instead of human population has been heated constantly. While I concede that the investing towards humans play an integral role in several ways, I hold a strong belief that spending on protecting these kinds of wild animals is in the interests of humankind.
From my point of view, there are strong reasons advocating the view that money and effort should be allocated to the welfare of human. First, the poverty and homelessness rates in many undeveloped and developing countries are on the increase are in dire need of funding to remedy such problems and raise living standards. Second, they eat crops or also leave pathogens on plants, which reduces the quantity and efficiency of agricultural products. Compared to these rationales, combatting the demise of thousands of species does not seem like widespread concern.
On the other hand, I am persuaded that the unshaken importance of wildlife preservation. The most significant proof of protection of wild animals is that humans have an inextricable relationship with wildlife , which means that the extinction of wild animals could seriously threaten the survival of mankind. For example, an innumerable amount of modern medicines and vaccines, which are based on compounds found in plants as well as genes or viruses derived from animals, can help people deal with various types of diseases. In addition, wild animals have great aesthetic and socio-cultural values and they contribute to our rich bio-diversity. For instance, Hanoi zoo is type of business not only increasing the national budget but also saving wild animals.
In conclusion, the governments and environmental developers should determine mix budget allocation for between wildlife human society.
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Question 4 Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Question 4 Some people 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... inextricable relationship with wildlife , which means that the extinction of wild...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35314685315 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95599373593 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643356643357 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.448007413 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.583333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159230591078 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491158898895 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517745279986 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082481891631 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530076369256 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.