The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. others think it has an opposite effect. discuss both views and give your opinions
There is an opinion that the omnipresence of technology is widening the gap between the rich and the poor while others promote its benefits. In my perspective, I am on the opposite side of this view and I will discuss these views in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that there are now mass productions of goods made only for the wealthy due to technological advancement. For instance, Apple manufactures new versions of IPHONE, a kind of smartphone, annually with such a high price that is equivalent to numerous people’s yearly income. Therefore, it is definitely reserved for affluent people. Another example is space technology which allows people to travel into space at the expense of thousands of dollars. This price is highly prohibitive for people with low income to experience this service. These examples are the testament to the fact that technology is exacerbating the gap between rich and poor people.
On the other hand, however, there are always a range of items that have similar functions and are affordable for people from other economic classes. One can purchase a smartphone with a price that is equivalent to only half of the IPHONE’s price with relatively similar functions which comes from many brands such as Xiaomi or Vsmart. Moreover, if people with high income are able to enjoy a trip to space, people from lower economic classes can experience so-called weighlessness thanks to the advent of virtual reality. Thus, people from lower income bands can get access to technologies which are exclusively generated for the rich. Therefore, technologies are bridging the gap between social classes.
In conclusion, though upper social classes are likely to enjoy more state-of-the-art technological advancement, people from other classes can also experience these things at an affordable price due to the technology. I firmly believe that technology is capable of blurring the barrier between the wealthy and the poor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-23 | maidiem.1508 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-21 | vishal sachdeva | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-07 | datkhoa121 | 84 | view |
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor others think it has an opposite effect discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- The arena technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor others think is has an opposite effect discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- he chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should sp
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...romote its benefits. In my perspective, I am on the opposite side of this view an...
^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...m on the opposite side of this view and I will discuss these views in the followi...
^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...affordable price due to the technology. I firmly believe that technology is capab...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23899371069 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93852739276 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51572327044 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5195996714 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.066666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259037568468 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964154586527 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830665265374 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183831371051 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897640170747 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.