The diagrams below give information about two road tunnels in two Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagrams below give information about two road tunnels in two Australian cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pictures given compare the differences of two road tunnels of two particular cities in Australia.

Overall, it is obvious that the city’s tunnel structure which was builts later witnesses more modern developments and cost much more than the one that was constructed earlier. Additionally, the road tunnel, which was made later, has a greater capacity.

In detail, the more modernised road tunnel was built from 2002 to 2006, while from 1986 to 1998 was the constructed period of the other one. The cost of these two tunnels was different with the old one being 555 million dollars and the new one being 1,1 billion dollars. Notably, while the tunnel, which was constructed in the 20th century, can only endure 2 cars concurrently, the capacity of its morden counterpart is 3 cars.

Regarding the newer road tunnel, above it is a busy road with houses and tall buildings whereas above the older one is merely a bridge. The width and the length of the 21st-century road tunnel is 2,5 meters and 3,6 kilometers respectively, compared to the early-constructed one with the number being 1,5 meters and absent in that order. The morden tunnel was made from stone and clay, as opposed to the stand of the ancient one

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-29 maidiem.1508 73 view
2023-11-12 Daniel3003 78 view
2023-08-28 susanti 78 view
2023-08-15 anhalice 67 view
2023-08-15 Kaythlyn 67 view
Essays by user maidiem.1508 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89903846154 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70426175135 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552884615385 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2093001412 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134317296689 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722566261414 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640440513728 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115653000103 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760620728134 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.