The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. To what extent do you agree?

In recent years, the expansion of the gap between the rich and the poor caused by the proliferation of technology has been receiving a great deal of public attention. although this opinion appears appealing, the advantages would be far more significant.

there are some appealing rationales to reject this opinion. First, since cutting-edge technology has a function that enable people to boost work productivity, it creates wealth faster than ever. In fact, thanks to technology advancements, the processing rate of many devices has been improved drastically, which allows manpower and resources to be transferred swiftly and boosts the economic well-being. Second, by utilising technology, people, especially the poor or the rural, have more opportunities to pursue education. this means that with the support of the Internet, it is now possible for them to have an access to a large number of information sources at ease and to keep themselves updated, which helps them acquire skills and enrich them.

In addition, there are more important advantages of technology. Third, in order to enhance the income, people can participate in online business like YouTube phenomena. In fact, some social networks, be it YouTube and Facebook, provide the function that allow people to associate with their advertisement networks, which increases individual earnings. Last but not least, by furnishing more job opportunities, technology has been shrinking the gap between the rich and the poor. For example, in recent years, a number of ride-sharing apps, including Grab and Uber, have sprung up, which helps a large number of people escape from unemployment.

In conclusion, although the development of technology is not without disadvantages, the upsides will justify these. By utilising it in the right way, people can improve their life better.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-15 phoaiphuthinh 78 view
Essays by user phoaiphuthinh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...iving a great deal of public attention. although this opinion appears appealing, the adv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ges would be far more significant. there are some appealing rationales to reject...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...more opportunities to pursue education. this means that with the support of the Inte...
^^^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...et, it is now possible for them to have an access to a large number of information source...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... possible for them to have an access to a large number of information sources at ease and to keep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 594, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...b and Uber, have sprung up, which helps a large number of people escape from unemployment. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48251748252 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02648585114 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594405594406 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8960525313 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138465137316 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478715958959 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798271308509 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890346488191 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525597150254 0.056905535591 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.