Reading for pleasure can develop imagination and language skills better than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Media)
Nowadays, media has become more and more worthwhile than ever. For many of us, media is always a helpful tool for education, entertainment and connection. Many people argue that watching TV is unable to improve imagination and language skills. I am partly disagree with this opinion and in this essay I will support my view with examples.
On the one hand, the idea of watching TV is beneficial to some extent. Firstly, TV can be a sources of new knowledge that was demonstrated lively and edited to be more intersting for people. This could be explaned by the fact that in order to create a documentary required creativity, intelligibity and passionate for the work. So watching TV helps us wider our imagination by details and facts.
Secondly, learning new languages especially in speaking skills and listening can be complicated if people only study it in textbooks but not searching for instance. For example, if we need to master communciation in another language, we should watch TV in the chanel teach that language so we can observe their mouth shapes and intimate them speaking that words.
Nevertheless, I believe that reading for enjoyment is an effective way to expand imagination and language skills. The first reason is that reading is an active form of learning, it helps stimulate people brain to imagine, analyze and reflect previous knowledge. The second reason is books can helps people learn new vocabulary and different grammatical structures through fantastic stories.
In conclusion, although watching TV or any mass media presents certain advantages, I contended that it should not be encouraged due to many wrong content on TV these day. It is beneficial that people balance the amount of watching TV and reading for pleasure to develop brain in the appropriate ways.
- More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch tv programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Men and women are different in terms of their characteristics and abilities For this reason some jobs are better done by men and others by women Do you agree or disagree 73
- Do you agree or disagree that celebrities are paid far too much money 61
- Reading for pleasure can develop imagination and language skills better than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree Media 73
- Children are now less active in their free time than in the past Therefore sports must be compulsory in schools To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...nation and language skills. I am partly disagree with this opinion and in this essay I w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a source' or simply 'sources'?
Suggestion: a source; sources
...cial to some extent. Firstly, TV can be a sources of new knowledge that was demonstrated ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'these days'?
Suggestion: this day; these days
...ouraged due to many wrong content on TV these day. It is beneficial that people balance t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10169491525 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90215820791 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579661016949 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9164346888 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333111420063 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105284336526 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581251382121 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169954873482 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381314982277 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...nation and language skills. I am partly disagree with this opinion and in this essay I w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a source' or simply 'sources'?
Suggestion: a source; sources
...cial to some extent. Firstly, TV can be a sources of new knowledge that was demonstrated ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'these days'?
Suggestion: this day; these days
...ouraged due to many wrong content on TV these day. It is beneficial that people balance t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10169491525 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90215820791 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579661016949 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9164346888 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333111420063 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105284336526 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581251382121 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169954873482 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381314982277 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.