A recent newspaper article reports that a 14-year-old boy who seriously destroyed his school got a punishment to clean streets instead of sent to the prison, do you think this is right, or the young criminals should be sent to the jail?
An appropriate punishment to youth who break the law is always a heated topic among the public. People argue whether community service is a proper punishment to youths who terribly hurt other people or destroy public property. This essay will discuss the possible reason why people are very kind to the youth offence and whether they are should be suffering more serious judgement such as seal in jail.
On the one hand, folks are treating young offence in a humane way. First of all, age is a large consideration when judge a child who committed a crime. That is because by the law we have to protect youth criminals’ rights and provide a restart opportunity instead of damaging their future. Besides, People considered the child did not really realize what the consequence they have to face if they do things wrong. Shoplifting, for example, some children commit it for fun or even just want to show his or her courage to their peers.
On the other hand, it seems over protecting is a common phenomenon in some nations. To begin with, a light judgement and a minor crime cost may encourage the youth offence to commit another crime. Take the young boy destroyed his school that published in a newspaper as an example, unlike send to jail, most of the community service cannot scare criminals and they are more likely to re-offend. In addition, schools may suffer more if other students doing the same thing. Furthermore, despite the trial should judge the youth criminals depend on the specific situation, the law about youth murders should be revised. Recent news about 12-years-old boy murdered his mother because her strict parenting and finally has been free to go is really shocking the public. Thus, individuals have to take responsibility for whatever they have done and it is necessary to revise the current law about youth criminals in some countries.
In conclusion, although people have to consider the future of youth offence, some particular crime is necessary to deal with severely. Personally, I strongly disagree with the punishment for the student who destroyed the school seriously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-12 | Vivek chovatiya | 87 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Vivek chovatiya | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Vivek chovatiya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Jack koh | 64 | view |
| 2019-04-21 | supertony | 68 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 61
- the two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 92
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a humane way" with adverb for "humane"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... hand, folks are treating young offence in a humane way. First of all, age is a large considera...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, really, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99716713881 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67319145209 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56657223796 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1119810189 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.764705882 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47058823529 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186231834386 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560959082953 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466916418131 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106348451583 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370580093633 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.