The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.
This bar graph illustrates the data of people used five different kinds of transportation suffered incidents and injuries every 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) in the year 2002.
Looking at the information in more detail, we can see that the demand response was caused by the highest incidents and injuries in 2002, at 225 and 173 respectively. This is followed by the people who used buses which caused incidents and injuries at 76 for the former and 66 for the latter. Similarly, the use of light rail contributed to exactly the same figure on the incidents as the bus, while people got injuries were much lower at 39.
By contrast, the heavy rail accounted at a much lower figure in the number of incidents and injuries which as nearly 5 times less than the demand response. The commuter rail was occupied the lowest numbers of incidents and injuries at 20 and 17 respectively.
Overall, it is clear that comparing with the other four transport types, the demand response was more likely to occur an incident and to cause an injury. Furthermore, the commuter rail was the safest transportation in 2002.
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 87
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries. 67
- The bar chart below shows the money spent on consumer goods in different countries. 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95287958115 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73937588845 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3392045043 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258179561228 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119401955385 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092884504667 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174552025052 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106962596263 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.