In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes which have occurred. Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
The family structure and the role of each people in the family have undergone some alternations. In this essay, I will discuss about several changes and their positive impacts on the society in general and each people in particular.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that family pattern has progressed remarkbly. Nuclear family became the mosr popular kind of family. In the past, in order to reduce housing costs , different generations have to live in a house together. Rising in citizen's income enables people to live with only their siblings or parents. Moreover, due to the perception of gender equality, the role of women has altered. As a result, more and more women go out of home with a view to pursuing their own profession.
On the other hand, this trend brings many advantages to people. Firstly, due to the popularity of nuclear family, the privacy of each person enhanced, which leads to a comfortable and healthy live. As a result, they may have enough time for themselves without disturbance from others. Secondly, as both men and women go to work to earn salaries, , the financial burden is likely to be reduced. They not only have decent budgets to cover their basic needs but they can also reserve money for their children. This results in an improvement in the living standard.
In conclusion, the family pattern and family roles developed significantly and these will lead to a liveable society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | Wangdu | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | annaalysia007 | 11 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | dejoyce89 | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-18 | Nguyen le Ngoc Tram | 66 | view |
| 2017-01-28 | kingnight153 | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features anf make comparision 82
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes which have occurred Do you think these changes are positive or negative 56
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 100
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people Some people think having a younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e past, in order to reduce housing costs , different generations have to live in a...
^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n and women go to work to earn salaries, , the financial burden is likely to be re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in general, in particular, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9125 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65459446966 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608333333333 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5021541003 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.6 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183809425333 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556174015207 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709978618967 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132988805951 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845799993222 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.