In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travels to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Recently, plenty of small local stores have shut down as customers prefer to do their shopping from big trade centre or malls. It is a positive development because people can find a variety of options in one place and cheaper goods due to the competition.
This is a positive development because customers can choose a lot of variation of products in a single place. That is to say that, big stores have enough spaces to display different kinds of goods. As a result, people save time and energy by not going to different shops for each item. For example, one of the biggest fashion brand in the UK, H&M only have the full new collections in the stores which are in big shopping complexes as there is not enough space in the smaller ones.
Another reason of why this is a positive improvement is because customers can find low-cost products in shopping centres as there is a competition between higher number of stores. For attracting more consumers and burst the sales, shops that have similar goods in the same location, bring down the prices therefore buyers who prefer to shop from malls have advantage to find less expensive products compare to small traders. For example, big brands like Zara and Topshop doing special discounts at the same times of the year to compete with each other.
In conclusion, there has been a rising interest to shopping malls recently from consumers that caused to closure of many petty trades. This is a positive improvement as range of options in one place and competitions between stores reduce prices.
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travels to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Life was better when technology was simpler To what extent do you agree and disagree 61
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84586466165 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52797396799 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545112781955 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0909987448 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.181818182 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35967048106 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127320830739 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710989191537 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221501272528 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396587096809 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.