In recent years, some countries have experienced very rapid economic development. This has resulted in higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the countryside. What problems could this cause? How could these problems be reduced?
Nowadays, in some countries, a greater living standard in cities compared to rural areas has been driven by the rapid economic progress. This essay will outline the consequences of this problem as well as the way to resolve it.
First of all, one of the detrimental effects is that the rapid number of urbanization can contribute to generate zero population growth in suburban areas as happened in China. Along with poor essential services (education and healthcare), this drives people to leave their agriculture background inducing lower food security which reflect to economic turmoil in the long run. Furthermore, an outburst of population in central areas arouses both greater work competition and higher unemployment rate. Most of developed countries, UK and USA, deal with shocks in migration fears which are greatly elevate incidence of crime rate.
Regarding the aforementioned results, a remarkable solution can be implemented through focusing on the equity of rural development, prominently sustainable agricultural practices and food systems. United Nations presents that supporting fundamental resources ranging from mechanical tools to crop protection materials can assist farmers to achieve profitable markets along with better subsistence level. Moreover, improving local public administration is also needed to increase capability and stakeholder participations. Presented by the Local Development Strategies, some of private investments can assist local communities to embrace their agrotourism infrastructures fostering endogenous potential.
To sum up, the rapid growth of economic development in cities reveal several remarkable effects including metropolitan overpopulation and higher rate of unemployment. However, this can be tackled by enhancing effective rural development and intensive role of stakeholder participations.
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 84
- The plans show the change of a small theatre in 2010 and 2012 73
- In modern times some species of animals are slowly disappearing Do you think that it is acceptable for species to become extinct What are the possible reasons and consequences of this extinction Provise reasons and examples to explain your opinion 61
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 84
- In many cities planners tend to arrange shops schools offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'elevated'.
Suggestion: elevated
...ks in migration fears which are greatly elevate incidence of crime rate. Regarding t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, regarding, so, well, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08396946565 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29562416369 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664122137405 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8110792501 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185850477426 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06407297868 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053446913846 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124728324287 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773107229911 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.98 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.55 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'elevated'.
Suggestion: elevated
...ks in migration fears which are greatly elevate incidence of crime rate. Regarding t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, regarding, so, well, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08396946565 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29562416369 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664122137405 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8110792501 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185850477426 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06407297868 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053446913846 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124728324287 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773107229911 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.98 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.55 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.