In recent years, tourists have paid attention to preserving both the culture and environment of the places they visit. However, some people think that it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is true that more and more tourists have been conscious of cultural and environmental aspects of the countries they visit, although many individuals believe that it is impracticable for those travellers to bear responsibility for these aspects. In my opinion, while I agree that attention has been paid to both culture and environment by tourists themselves, I refute the ladder idea that it is infeasible for them to have responsible manners.
It stands to reason that the large number of holiday-makers have been aware of the cultural and environmental issues of the host nations. In the last decades, tourists used to spark hostility to the locals, in where they visit, seeing that they did litter the street and break the traditional rules and regulations, which are the time-honored traditions of the host countries. But, this is no longer the case in this day and age due to the fact that individuals are being raised cultural and environmental consciousness of the locals. To illustrate, in Singapore, a country well-know for the hygiene regulations and street cleanliness, visitors often caused frustration because they didnot comform to these strict rules when they pay a visit to this country. With the passing of time, they are gradually adopting the norms of this nation and learn how to protect the environment effectively and efficiently.
However, I do argue that it is a fallacy to say that tourists cannot be liable for their impacts on the environment and conventions of the countries they flock to. Some proponents of this point of view maintain that those occasional visitors would not follow all the traditions and ways of protecting environment of the locals as time is limited. But, in my view, it is the matter of consciousness, not time. If, for example, holiday-makers strive to spend one to two days with instructors who excel at convenions and environment practices of the host nations, then it is more likely that they could easily adopt all these norms and practices. Consequently, they could feel more confident when roaming around these nations and even receive hospitality from all the locals there.
In conclusion, while I advocate that cultural and environmental awareness are being developed, it is not impossible for all tourist to behave responsibly with the nations they travel to.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-27 | kingnight153 | 73 | view |
| 2017-04-27 | kingnight153 | 73 | view |
- More and more people have pets in their homes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having pets ? 95
- Happiness is considered very important in life. Why is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness? 61
- The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008. 61
- Schools should not force children to learn a foreign language To what estent do you agree with this statement 57
- International community must act immediately to ensure all nations to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels e.g gas and oil. Do you agree or disagree? 37
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03773474977 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2847512972 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.538461538 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2307692308 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287509361159 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101704065339 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731339763504 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187964922272 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438424607357 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.