Researches show that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertisements of food products should be banned in the same way as cigarettes advertising is banned in many countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Researches show that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertisements of food products should be banned in the same way as cigarettes advertising is banned in many countries.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Scientific studies show that consumption of more than enough is equally unhealthy as smoking. It is my firm belief that commercial publicity of food products should be prohibited in the same manner many nations do to cigarettes. Since this encourages sound eating habits and prolongs people's life span.

The most important reason why food product adverts should be forbidden in tandem with cigarettes is to reduce addiction. In other words, if there is no public awareness of such products given, only few people will be interested in them. For example, it has been found that the ban of cigarettes advertising in some countries, tremendously helped to decrease the number of people who smoke. Therefore, if food products are not allowed to be promoted through mass media, a habbit of eating more than required can eventually disappear.

Another reason why food products should not be hyped is to reduce the prevalence of the diseases that emanate from over consuming. For instance, if people eat a balanced diet, they become healthy and live longer. Furthermore, when people are not occasionally falling sick, this gives a relief to overburdened health budgets and the surplus cash realised will be used to finance and improve other government services. Nevertheless, if advertisements of fast foods is permitted in public places, people's life expectancy maybe shortened due to illnesses caused by excessively eating. Hence, the need to promote public health through unauthorisation of food merchandise marketing is inevitable.

In conclusion, I have completely admitted that banning of food product advertising should be taken seriously by any country that values its citizenry well being and resources.

WORDS 268

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-10 Chims 84 view
Essays by user Chims :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...if there is no public awareness of such products given, only few people will be interes...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is no public awareness of such products given, only few people will be intereste...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41111111111 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93192306166 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651851851852 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6410522512 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283817742378 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844738232545 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721827228095 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178262205542 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480252196001 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.