Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Maintaining dated buildings in some urban areas can cost governmental funding a fortune. Instead, it would be more advantageous to mostly invest in transportation facilities as well as housings. From my perspective, I partly agree with this statement since there are some significant heritages which is too valuable to be demolished
On the one hand, it is true that the demand for accommodation and streets these days is increasingly exponential. Specifically, more and more people are migrating to the metropolitan areas in hope of finding well-paid jobs and elevate their living standards, leading to a deteriorating situation of traffic congestion and crowded quarters in some big cities. As a result, it is of immense importance for authorities to spend more money to construct more accommodations as well as amenities for transportation
On the other hand, some historical buildings are really valuable in terms of culture and architecture or being symbolized as a whole country. A dated construction can play an essential role in inhabitants’ mental life when it is not only an inspiration for art but also has been witnessed many ups and downs of a nation. Moreover, these buildings are also really advantageous for the local business when they can attract many travelers and improve the income of local people. Taking the Imperial City of Hue as a prime example, this is a well-known tourist attraction owing to its unique designs and magnificent stories behind, it enhances more opportunities for some of the local people start their own business
To conclude, although heritages are sometimes considered obsolete to the current society. In my opinion, I suppose that authorities should not over-prioritize the accommodation or transportation facilities as historical constructions are really beneficial for the income of the local people as well as an indispensable part of citizens’ spiritual lifestyle
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that it is a good idea for older people to work if it is possible for them to do so Do you agree or disagree 56
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 664, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ind, it enhances more opportunities for some of the local people start their own business ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, really, so, well, i suppose, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36409803002 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3008025429 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.666666667 106.682146367 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3333333333 20.7667163134 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126046871147 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554238923521 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375304332416 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755208218469 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415581832537 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.0946893788 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.06 50.2224549098 42% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.