The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14. Write a 150-word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares major financial supports received by international students in the Usa between two periods 2003/04 and 2013/14
Overall, the number of students in total was seen with a sharp increase over the given years. Also, an upward trend was witnessed in all types of funding, except for other sources
In 2003/04, out of total 572 509 overseas students, 67% of them were supported by themselves or their families with 385 543 students. Funding from US college or university was received by 134 015 stusents which comprised only 23% of total. Foreign government or university, current employer and other sources supported no more than 30 000 students each, which were not over 5% of the total
In 2013/14, personal and family still remained as the main financial source with 574 129 students, accounting for 65% of total 886052 students. Remarkably, while there was a highest increase of 390% in students supported by current employer, an only decrease of 14% was seen in the figure of other sources. With exceptions of Foreign Government or university and current employer, the remaing funing sources were witnessed with 2-4% declines in their proportions of total
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 78
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- Today food travels thousands of miles before it reaches customers Why is this so Is this a positive or negative trend 67
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...2 students. Remarkably, while there was a highest increase of 390% in students su...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14583333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66723626729 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598958333333 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7450602328 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.666666667 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155805582507 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830140023644 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402010127018 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111866077563 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540321109617 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.