Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.
Refurbishment expenditure of some old buildings in urban areas makes up the government budget. Owing to the fact that, many people argued that, to spend such money for other productive usages like construction of new roads and apartments. However, in my opinion, novel roads and buildings would be essential, nevertheless, renovating expense may be relatively lower than an ingenious home construction. At once, government can categorize other money for roads and transportation, though, in this essay fairly disagree with statement.
New building constructors have enough choice for restoration of old buildings in terms of structural and functional dependence. In other words, being able to built a new building in the preferred location would have various dilemma like landscape, location, near by buildings and so on. Thereby, refurbishment would be affordable and effective way to restore a buildings as contemporary manner by the technology and interior services. Moreover, to illustrate, during the time of refurbishment, the builders could use the preserved things which is essential for works as same for the old building. In turn, in new home, the owner or government should need to buy all the items newly and this may lead to cost issues to some extent.
Regarding the new construction of homes and roads, government should discriminate budget for homes indifferent to road and transportation. Devoid of budget issues by the proper management rather than misusing the old building construction by the name of irrelevant facts like this. Furthermore, government could organize money for road construction by road tax, and public transports income to the core. Deprive of old buildings for the development of roads and new homes may have detrimental impacts on the landscape and natural location. Finding a new area for the roads and other buildings is more beneficial as compared to destruction of old buildings and rearrange such money for particular subjects.
To sum up, innovative roads and homes are inevitable to the public, notwithstanding, in my perspective, restoration would not makes up the government spends if it is properly arranged or to order a good construction team for the refurbishments.
- the chart below shows the average spending on cloths per person in US in 1985 1995 and 2005 56
- The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity? 73
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...rious dilemma like landscape, location, near by buildings and so on. Thereby, refurbish...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a building' or simply 'buildings'?
Suggestion: a building; buildings
...affordable and effective way to restore a buildings as contemporary manner by the technolog...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...n my perspective, restoration would not makes up the government spends if it is prope...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4265129683 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2424834837 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544668587896 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.76152304609 294% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.560453454 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.533333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312918549288 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118117587573 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494156829297 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195081132172 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638820300607 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.