Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Views differ on whether developed countries should offer either money or other kinds of help to the developing countries for poverty solving. Although both views are reasonable as each has its own merits, I agree with the latter one.
To begin with, it is undeniable that financial support plays a critical role in accelerating a nation's growth. In the world, there are many examples of rich nations which donated money in the form of fundings, loans to the poor ones with a view to improving the living standards in these nations. This can be illustrated by the fact that Japan once provided Vietnam with some large loans without being repaid . Owing to this, Vietnam had adequate potential finance to upgrade its infrastructure in many cities.
However, it is true that sometimes financial aid does not completely go to people who actually need it. Thus, to tackle this problem, there is nothing better than giving specific help such as donating food, medical items,... For instance, in the outbreak of CoronaVirus, several countries have given aid to others by sending doctors and nurses to the areas which are heavily suffering the pandemic in order to treat patients there. Furthermore, in terms of education, developed countries can assist low income nations by providing scholarships, educational opportunities which are a great way to help students purchase their studying career.
In conclusion, from some aforementioned justification, my firm conviction is that wealthy countries should take many different ways into consideration to support the poor countries more directly and effectively.

Votes
Average: 7 (18 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...plays a critical role in accelerating a nations growth. In the world, there are many ex...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...th some large loans without being repaid . Owing to this, Vietnam had adequate pot...
^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...elp such as donating food, medical items,... For instance, in the outbreak of Coro...
^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...n is that wealthy countries should take many different ways into consideration to support the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32283464567 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89036900539 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681102362205 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1760912698 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.909090909 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28759191692 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914675157232 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960834890535 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172521624582 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847883819426 0.056905535591 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.