The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world's cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be made to encourage people to use their cars less and public transport more.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an argument that the level of usage of private vehicles is on the growth which is evidence for traffic jams and atmospheric pollution are accelerating in different parts of the world. Urban transports should be popularized among the community that makes the cities more livable. In my opinion, public transport network inspiration is more significant for their environmentally-friendly aspect and to downturn congestions.
Underpinning local public transportation as opposed to passenger vehicles is important because of its positive effects on nature. At the turn of the 21st century, since most public transportation that operates on electricity has been produced through solar panels and nuclear stations, even the cities environment tends to become fresher. While the opposite true with vehicles, they emit toxic gases causing the massive level of air pollution, as a result, pollutants shroud in smog over the city. For instance, a thick blanket of smog has been hanging over the city in Japan over the 50 years until the government encouraged the electric railway system to the community. Thus, public transports have more importance to increase standards of living in urban areas than private cars.
Inspiring community transports are likely to be more efficient to decrease heavy congestion which has becoming a metropolitan to the stressful area. It is true that since while the number of vehicles especially private ones causes more traffic volume as opposed to public transport which saves up more of space. For example, Transport magazine informs that, Paris becomes a lack of congestion which has made welfare because of using passenger transport rather than a personal one. Therefore, the community should travel by mass transports rather than private cars which are commonly believed to decline traffic jams.
In conclusion, I believe that encouraging public transportation not only improves the quality of the environment but also it fails off transits which make the city habitable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | Lyly241096 | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-17 | Isha Mehra | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Nodir00 | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-10 | Anabahari | 78 | view |
| 2014-05-06 | Ky Vanchhay | 75 | view |
- The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world s cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities attempts must be mad 78
- Computer games are very popular for all ages and nationalities Parents think this has little educational value and it will be harmful for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction today To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction today To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...r panels and nuclear stations, even the cities environment tends to become fresher. Wh...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49358974359 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03317591763 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4993937276 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.846153846 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142002055746 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537565505623 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311851993986 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883065143192 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155770833924 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.