Robots can free people from difficult or dangerous work. However, some people are worried about the possible dangers. What’s your opinion?
In recent years, robots have been eventually closer to human beings on a regular basis. Therefore, people are easier to deal with many challenges. Other people, however, are anxious about their shortcomings. In my opinion, robots are not too dangerous to frighten human beings as they think.
It is undeniable that robots are becoming essential to our lives through their unusual functions. Because robots are not human, they are beneficial in many actions that are impossible for a human being to handle. For example, if many geographers want to gain a deeper insight into the formation of a volcano, the robot will assist them to address this challenge. It is the work that they couldn't solve in the past and now they can find out this challenge and even any other mysteries all over the world. In addition, when properly maintained, they can't get ill. They don’t need a vacation and need to look after a family.
On the other side, robots can’t assume responsibility. They can just only do what they are programmed. It means that they constantly need a human being to program and guide them. To be more specific, they can’t solve problems that crop up or adapt to changing circumstances that might arise while working. When left unattended, they could cause much damage and could produce large qualities of waste before reprogramming. In some cases, robots may have unintentional errors leading to unexpected results. The medical field has applied robots to surgery, which is very unsafe due to the technical failure of robots happening at any time.
In this essay, I have described the characteristic of robots, how they could serve humans, and how their weaknesses are. To sum up, it is my opinion that robots can’t threaten humans yet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...his challenge. It is the work that they couldnt solve in the past and now they can find...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 548, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ddition, when properly maintained, they cant get ill. They don’t need a vacation and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in my opinion, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9693877551 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66242243463 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625850340136 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5635927583 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8947368421 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4736842105 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1482580595 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481634008045 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438609914811 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958068838585 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420878089763 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.