School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is controversial that whether preceptors or the parents affect children’s ingenious and or social development.
Albait, there is a dichotomy of views on this concern, I am of the opinion that in my perspective this apprehension is totally warranted I the light of early childhood learning and socioeconomic culture facts.
It is well evident to prove when an adolescent opens his eyes at first he sees his parents at first, not teachers. Moreover juveniles spend most of the time with parent than instructors. In addition most people have conformity bias that parents vehemently acquire to manipulate children’s social development and high IQ. For example education developments have shown that 75% of youngster’s upbringings are dependent on their guardians who prefer to raise themselves with proper attention and care. Hence, whatever a child learns at an early age it credit goes to the progenitor.
There are infallible testimonies to prove that adolescents develop their adroit along with socioeconomic culture. In contrast socioeconomic factors are hobbies, society and food habits of youngsters which get from their family. However, it is an integral part of the topic from where children belong to. Nevertheless when a family is more knowledgeable and rational, child unintentionally relay on that attitude. The first influence of a child is parents. Thus it is obvious that education and social development should be step out from a family.
In conclusion, even if there is a cognitive bias that children obey the command from superiors as they are aware of the consequences and punishments on the contrary as I am concern to be knowledgeable and societal relies on parents in lieu of teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ees his parents at first, not teachers. Moreover juveniles spend most of the time with p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...e time with parent than instructors. In addition most people have conformity bias that p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'credits'?
Suggestion: credits
...tever a child learns at an early age it credit goes to the progenitor. There are in...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...it along with socioeconomic culture. In contrast socioeconomic factors are hobbies, soci...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...he topic from where children belong to. Nevertheless when a family is more knowledgeable and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 458, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... first influence of a child is parents. Thus it is obvious that education and social...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19397956384 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59706959707 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9972169982 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11744158349 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394602179327 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037223255987 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575056155053 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405060994213 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.