School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, an individual's social status is often defined by how he behaves in society rather than his physical appearance. As a result, parents became more concerned about their child's growth and started to take responsibility. However, others think that a teacher is the most suitable person who can help a pupil developing thinking skills and good manners.
On one hand, one's first seven years of living represent its initiation in life. At this tender age, someone's conduct is the easiest to form and mould as their cognitive skills are their best state. Since this period is being spent surrounded by our parents, they become the core of our development. Thus, the decision they make could lead to the outlining of our character. For instance, either of the cartoons programmes they allow us to watch or the toys they buy reflect particular conduct that could train our communication skills or imagination.
On the other hand, evolving requires having a nearby critique eye concisely presenting your strengths and weaknesses. When attending school, teachers become those critics, observing your capacity of assimilating information. Therefore, their remarks could make you revise your manners and conduct and motivate your inner self to concentrate and follow the class lectures. Moreover, if tutors adjust their lessons and projects based on their pupils' necessities, children could face a convenient environment for their development.
To conclude, I believe that one can achieve social and intellectual development only with honesty and self-consciousness. That is why school authorities are the most responsible and impactful factors in someone's life, as they can trigger those two attributes.
- In some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard in their studies What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 78
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the proportions of graduates from Brighton University in 2019 entering different employment sectors Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
Nowadays, an individuals social status is often defined by how h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...kills and good manners. On one hand, ones first seven years of living represent i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47727272727 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96365146864 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681818181818 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9455232736 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127811981368 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386074988158 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362585751198 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797434743677 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479822115241 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.