Schools have a limited amount of money to spend . Some people suggest that it should be spent on good teachers while others say it should be used for buying equipment like computers. Discuss both view s and give your opinion
In the present times, schools are facing financial crunch situations, available budget can be invested either on good teachers or on technological equipments. This essay discusses about the both views before reaching the adequate conclusion.
To commence with, it is better to spend money hiring qualified and smart tutors. The reason is that students need proper guidence , care and environment for best performance in academics and curriculums. Moreover, teachers usually know the qualities and skills which students posses and such talents can be brought out and improved in the supervision of dedicated teachers. Thus, teachers has an effective influence for the betterment of students.
On the other side, sometimes, guides are unable to perform some activities which other equipments and gizmos can do. Schools should have physics , chemistry and computer labs and sometimes, theoretical knowledge can be boring and monotonous for students, inspite of it , they can experience the practical use of the science and computer theories in labs. Furthermore, computers are better source of learning any language because dictionary applications in computers make easy to find any word meaning in no time.
To conclude, after discussing the both notions , it can be said that both investents on good teachers and on computers are essential aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...on is that students need proper guidence , care and environment for best performan...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...zmos can do. Schools should have physics , chemistry and computer labs and sometim...
^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d monotonous for students, inspite of it , they can experience the practical use o...
^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...clude, after discussing the both notions , it can be said that both investents on ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 206.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53883495146 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92981003618 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.660194174757 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7435859566 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28460085784 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951555610335 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574606067264 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162069100117 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396964709806 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.