Schools should stop using books for teaching children as they find them boring, and use film, TV and computer instead. To what extent do agree with this?
Some opinions proposed that traditional education methods need to be constantly replacing by multimedia by applying the movie, technology in the modern-day. Thanks to these innovations in new teaching, students will get more positive own’s feelings about how are focused on intoxication throughout the lesson. Looking from an overall perspective, technologies will be seeming to stimulate children’s brains and more attracting participate of learners.
First of all, it is not denied that multimedia tools played a vital role in the aspect of their lives, truly it is that a treasure trove information which is an aid to students are researched all of the lessons that they expected. That much like books, the learner tends to be tedious since have been a habit learned day-by-day. Indeed, children are always curious instincts, thus, they don’t force children who are complying with one method of knowledge learned. Without in doubt, A book has just contained the figures or old-conception that could be not animated, which leads to limited envisage in children’s minds.
On the other hand, that by utilizing computers and television into teaching in educational institutions which are ensuring fairness with all young people over the worlds into the cases of lacking teachers in another country. Furthermore, obtained the technology during the Covid-19 pandemic that has been occurring for 2 years, that is contributed to the acquisition of knowledge more than ever that the pandemic had restricted schooling of children at that time. Whereby, all of the students have guarantee into acquiring of lessons reliance on technology advancement.
In conclusion, it is certain that is approving the technology in teaching are fairly essential, students will get more benefits in this and further towards comprehensive into the growth up to their knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... overall perspective, technologies will be seeming to stimulate children’s brains and more...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ch is an aid to students are researched all of the lessons that they expected. That much l...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ling of children at that time. Whereby, all of the students have guarantee into acquiring ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'guaranteed'.
Suggestion: guaranteed
...time. Whereby, all of the students have guarantee into acquiring of lessons reliance on t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, look, so, thus, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46712802768 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01598730169 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615916955017 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3122212646 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.636363636 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978622991888 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340724198011 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03300818786 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550948777855 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278118227877 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.