Scientific innovation is always a positive thing and should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Nowadays, there are many controversial questions relating to scientific innovation, leading to contradicts among our social. Despite a range of arguments that had been offered by the experts, I strongly believe that this factor play a pivotal role in the development of humankind; therefore it should be encouraged in these days.
First of all, concerning about the societal aspects, our world had witnessed the appearance of a considerable number of cutting-edge technology innovation, making the convenience for the life. In the fact, had it not been for these pioneering achievements, people could have had nothing the progresses as regarded through many centuries. The cities might be disappeared in the perspective from outside of atmosphere in case the lights had not been innovated. Additionally, the industrial revolution 4.0 perhaps be only a main theme of various fiction story with lacking of artificial intelligence, enabling our community to shortage a distance of contacting with each other through electronic device such as smart phone or laptop, as well as allow the systems of manufactory producing a high productivity, relieving their overheads that they incurring.
Turning to the point of medicine, people could not deny the necessity of modern methods and tools in treatment, helping a thousand individuals to fight against the severe diseases. In particular, the DNA combination engineering enabling physicians to apply the immunology therapy to inhibit the spreading of mutated cells or recover the function of genes in oncology patients, devising the suitable curing with any case. Moreover, the scientists had used the medical innovation to defeat the global pandemic in many recent decades like SARS or Ebola.
In general, the advantages of scientific accomplishment are definitely outweighing the drawbacks that those brought to our life. Consequently, these should be encouraged on a global scale by many effective approaches like funding the budget in erecting the laboratories or hubs in some countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-04 | caomaiphuong050605 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-04 | caomaiphuong050605 | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-22 | hardyboywwe | 89 | view |
| 2020-04-22 | hardyboywwe | 84 | view |
- The graphs show the percentage of loans in different categories in 2 libraries between 1980 and 2010 with predicted figures for 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- People in all modern societies use drugs but today s youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs and at an increasingly early age Some sociologists claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example Discuss the causes an 84
- Scientific innovation is always a positive thing and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons for your answer 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disgree with this statement 56
- The graph below shows the number of students studying different subject areas in one adult education collee between 1985 and 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'contradict'.
Suggestion: contradict
...ng to scientific innovation, leading to contradicts among our social. Despite a range of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in general, in particular, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5884244373 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16200301158 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636655948553 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.6370192279 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2727272727 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122820517241 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411991717155 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373347849162 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776025119067 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366095047202 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.