Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
The priority of controlling and implementing scientific research, whose responsibility belonging to governments, has set out two mainstreams of opinion. This essay will demonstrate both sides of the debate in which my opinion will support the action of the government.
It can be seen obviously that the management of authorities does impede the efficiency and effectiveness of research due to many reasons. First, scientists will definitely be limited their capability of creation, many unpractical ideas which can be successful will be disapproval. Secondly, the scales of research will probably be restrained by the governments to reduce unforeseeable consequences towards pedestrians. Moreover, being under the control of authorities can coincidently change the original purpose of scientific inventions into political tools, military weapons, we can take Alfred Nobel 's invention of dynamite as an obvious example, which had lead to tons of heartbreaking wars.
Despite those drawbacks above, the controlling is still extremely crucial. Science, in general, has not yet been fully discovered, tons of knowledge, mysteries are still unrevealed. Therefore, unexpected results do exist, we can not bet human beings for some unclarified scientific projects, the chemical explosion of Nuclear Power Plant Chernobyl which resulted in the tragic deaths of over 15000 people and 600000 wounded citizens is a huge warning. Many technology companies have been taking advantage of this problem to install in their products equipment that invading the privacy of users, and aim for long-term political strategies.
In conclusion, although governments have many negative impacts on scientific research, it is vital to be done.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 596, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls, military weapons, we can take Alfred Nobel s invention of dynamite as an obvi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75294117647 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19455996649 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674509803922 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0241222069 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1957526236 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734693199148 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538687697142 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121528571878 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036190046084 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.