Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, the necessity of scientific research has grown rapidly coupled with the development of economics and technology. Although private companies could do scientific research projects with their own capability, it is more reasonable for governments to cover this field.
There has been a number of reasons convincing that the government should be responsible for projects in the sciences sector. First, the government possesses a big budget from both tax revenue and foreign investment, which can thoroughly deal with the financial concerns of projects. In fact, by allocating resources in an efficient way, the government can considerably boost the nation’s key projects which require enormous funds. Second, the authority could connect and build a scientific expert community, ensuring every project is of speed and quality. For example, thanks to the developing international relationship among countries around the world, the government has played a vitally important role in hiring foreign specialists in several sectors, who would share their experiences and knowledge to support the local ones.
While private companies also have the ability to do scientific researches, there have been some barriers that interfere with them. First, since the scientific can affect directly the local citizens, regulations always impose stricter laws on non-government institutions. This means that every firm would have to deal with a burden of legal documents if they want to participate in sensitive sectors, especially in health and the environment. Second, it is difficult for a private company to build trust from research users due to the existence of some bad-intention projects. For example, in order to optimize profitability, some companies have utilized fake information to portray reality in a way that is favorable to their own interests which ends up deteriorating the trustworthiness of other companies.
In conclusion, while private companies could possess qualified financial power to do scientific research, the government is more likely to do it more safely and more reliable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-07 | jenifer Le | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-29 | jenifer Le | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-29 | jenifer Le | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | jenifer Le | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | mbn250 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sciences'' or 'science's'?
Suggestion: sciences'; science's
...ould be responsible for projects in the sciences sector. First, the government possesses...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...jects. In fact, by allocating resources in an efficient way, the government can considerably boost ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64984227129 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10506255783 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574132492114 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0484796205 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.769230769 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225052295434 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822281315747 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659991913268 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156576357319 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472578306694 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.