Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Agree or Disagree?
In the past decade, a multitude of scientific research has significantly contributed to the development of society. Some people believe that it should be conducted and controlled by governments while some opine that it is better to allow private companies to take that responsibility. Although there is ample evidence supporting the latter opinion, I agree with the former one.
It is indisputable that many private sectors are now willing to participate in undertake some scientific research, however, there are two dangers in this. First of all, if a scientific project is funded and managed by corporations, its credibility would suffer. In order to maximize profits and gain publicity, many of them may be tempted to manipulate results as well as to launch new products without adequate trials. For instance, thalidomide, developed by a German drug company, had led to thousands of malformed children. Second, without being controlled by the state, private companies may carry out illegal research related to nature or unethical human experimentation. In other words, leaving research in genetic engineering in the hands of corporations may have profound social consequences - such as GM (Genetically-Modified) crops which destroy whole ecosystems as a result of meddling with nature.
I believe that governments should play the leading role in performing research due to a number of compelling reasons. In today’s modern era, scientific research is the key to finding solutions to the pressing concerns of society. To exemplify, thorough medical research needs to be conducted by governments to develop vaccines against potential epidemics such as the COVID-19 and research into renewable energy is also crucial to dealing with global warming. These kinds of research require a great deal of spending, which can only be afforded by the government. Moreover, by controlling scientific research, the state can ensure that there is no research with unethical purposes such as nuclear power or weapons and hence protect the populations from terrorism and other social problems.
In brief, I strongly agree with the viewpoint that governments should bear sole responsibility for scientific research in terms of expenditure and safety reasons.
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 84
- The traditional that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 73
- Today more people are travelling than ever before Do the advantages of travelling outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses Agree or Disagree 78
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that it damages the environment and it should be stopped Discuss give opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpelling reasons. In today’s modern era, scientific research is the key to findin...
^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I strongly agree with the viewpoint that governments should bear sole responsibil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in brief, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52463768116 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17061375869 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9621099989 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.066666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361551886184 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107827055973 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783666060715 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21543847664 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242281738247 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.