Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people .why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development ?
The idea that it is soon when computers can completely replace human in operating vehicles remains a source of controversy. Despite some drawbacks, I totally agree that it is useful to let cars be driven by computers.
On the one hand. there are two main reasons why people should reduce computerizing in transportation. Firstly, the more modern the technology is, the more dependance it encourages human to become. Without knowledge of monitoring, people are likely to lose their control when the computer breaks down, which may result in severe accidents. Secondly, applying computers in transporting field may have a negative impact on people who are working as drivers. For example, no matter how well people drive, their experience can not compare with the huge data of information updated hourly by the cutting-edge technology. As a result, a large number of drivers may become unemployed with the appearance of computers, which makes them encounter difficulties in making ends meet.
On the other hand, I would argue that it is pressing to take the advantage of computer in every aspect of life, transportation in particular. On reason is that the advances of technology in computers enables people to travel more quickly and conveniently. In fact, thanks to data from satellites, computers are able to calculate the shortest route as well as avoid driving to traffic jams, therefore, not only this advantage brings enjoyable journey but also lessen the burden of traffic jams on roads. Another reason is the reduction of a significant number of accidents caused by drivers' faults. For instance, there are a lot of people driving cars after drinking too much beers and causing accidents because of their lack of concentration, which has never happened with computers.
In conclusion, although automatically driving can brings a few negative effects, I strongly believe that computer-driving should be taken into consideration due to its undeniable pros.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tsln7607 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | tsln7607 | 79 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | AnnaAlysia | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | thankforyourhelp | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | creaam | 78 | view |
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 92
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time. 78
- the graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
- NEW TECHNOLOGY HAVE CHANGED THE WAY CHILDREN SPEND THEIR FREE TIME. DO THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES? 89
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...en by computers. On the one hand. there are two main reasons why people should ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 629, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e cutting-edge technology. As a result, a large number of drivers may become unemployed with the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 671, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... people driving cars after drinking too much beers and causing accidents because of ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 51, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...ion, although automatically driving can brings a few negative effects, I strongly beli...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33226837061 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03838737056 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61661341853 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.113807085 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154164269293 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488544736433 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041005420614 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092684552086 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132723330256 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.