Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you
think the advantages will outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, the question whether a global language should be adopted has sparked a controversy. Although this appears to be a rational idea, its consequences will eclipse upsides.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that the adoption of a language offers a number of manifest benefits. First, since language homogeneity facilitates the communication between people, it will boost national economic well-being. In fact, a salient example is Singapore because it is a country that uses English as the first language, which plays a crucial role in opening avenues for the penetration of foreign investments thanks to the accessibility of business transactions. Second, by developing a global language, humankind will have the opportunity of enriching knowledge. Apparently, all documents will be written with a sole language, which helps humans can have a full grasp of many fields such as Math or Science, hence the foreign language limitations will be eased.
However, there is much compelling evidence proves that the disadvantages will overshadow the advantages. First, if a language disappears, the national identity of that country is also demolished. For instance, although the complexity of Chinese characters is an obstacle to the push for global of China, and Mao Zedong even told to an American journalist in 1936 that he would replace Chinese characters with Latin alphabets someday, the country still keeps its language because they afraid that their descendants will not be able to understand the national intangible cultural heritage. Second, with a view to preventing the loss of cultural diversities, people should not use mere language in common. This means that because a language has embedded customs, norms as well as ways of life, the indigenous culture of a nation would also be demolished if the language is gone, which is detrimental to the tourism since cultural diversity is the crucial factor that draws tourists’ attraction.
In conclusion, although the language assimilation is conducive to human to some extent, the disadvantages are far more significant.
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the positive aspects of this trend outweigh the negative aspects 89
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think the advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Sport is becoming a business with high income for professionals and more companies have involved in financial and in other ways It is a positive or negative development 78
- Sending criminals into prisons is the best way to reduce the rate of crime in society Do u agree or not 84
- In some countries shopping online is replacing shopping at store Discuss both the pros and cons of this trend 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
In recent years, the question whether a global language should be adopted has...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41463414634 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05569338226 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576219512195 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.0115409809 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.615384615 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183939102185 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724358481593 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441832226464 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116137249775 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025059906534 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.