Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad. Despite knowing that, million of people still continue doing unhealthy activities. What are the causes and what are the solutions for this?
It is a common practice that a large population does not lead a healthy lifestyle although they are fully aware of the negative consequences. Many people have questioned the motives behind this practice, and wondered whether there are measures to mitigate it. These would all be elaborated below.
To begin with, the perpetuity of bad habits could be accounted for by the convenience they are endowed with. Modern citizens are required to work full time to be able to cover monthly expenses, resulting in the fact that such a hectic pace of life does not allow people to have a self-prepared healthy meal. This induces workers to substitute their diet with greasy fast food, leading to permanent diseases such as obesity. In addition, as workers are susceptible to such a heavy workload, they must resort to caffeine substances to combat fatigue, which undoubtedly would take a toll on their well-being over time.
Regarding the solutions, it is imperative that managers ease the amount of work in an attempt to assist the personnel in ceasing deeply rooted and habitual acts. Additionally, by exercising a prohibition of cigarettes, coffee or offering incentives for employees who are willing to keep fit or abandon a sedentary lifestyle, managers could encourage a healthy working environment, which in turn are likely to promote productivity. Government involvement, meanwhile, could be significantly conducive in tackling this matter, as the authority could impose a higher tax on detrimental merchandise like junk food and tobacco to drive up the price of such goods and deter residents from consuming them.
In summary, by having the awareness of health care, citizens should restrain negative actions and therefore, they would not be subject to unexpected threatens to their health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-30 | nguyenanhanhanh | 73 | view |
- Increased world demands for oil and gas have made it necessary to look for these sources of energy in remote untouched natural places Do you think the advantages of locating new sources of energy outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such places 56
- Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult Others believe that it is getting easier Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that million of people still continue doing unhealthy activities What are the causes and what are the solutions for this 73
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, in particular, in summary, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3568627451 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95985182043 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670588235294 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8346678129 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919647037922 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273176087465 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293706147215 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05640523173 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299218835274 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.