Animals experiments have never failed to be a heated debate among society, research institutes, and universities. Some people hold the position that it would be interesting when using living animals for researches. However, some others take a view that animals experiments must be cruel. Personally, I would not be hesitate to side with the former view with several reasons.
The first important reason is that it would be easier to have direct consequences when using animals to do researches. When testing medical effects of a new type of medicine, scientists vaccinate this kind of medicine to animals such as mouse, dogs, etc. Hence, using animals could be a ready mean of measuring the experiment results in field of medical researches.
Moreover, with the development of gene technology and transplantation, we can use animals' organs or gene to cure human-being ourselves. As we all know, artificial organs and gene still have some drawbacks, like conflicition with other organs, when applying in medical care. Therefore, animals could make the contributions of organs and gene to patients.
Although it is suggested that using animals to do research would be contradicted to humanitarian pricinples, it is true that using animals in moderation would be helpful for progress of medical science researches. We appreciate contributions of these animals' life to research, but we have to do that. This is because not only is progress of medical researches beneficial for humans, but it would be great possible to crue some serious disease in animals.
In my opinion, I supposed that there is no evidence that showing the links between using animals for researches and cruelty if we can use animals in a reasonable way. It would be prospective useful for all creatures in our planet.
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the adva 61
- Scientists use living animals to carry out research. Some people think it is interesting, while some others think it is cruel. What is your opinion ? 73
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advan 61
- Scientists use living animals to carry out research. Some people think it is interesting, while some others think it is cruel. What is your opinion ? 61
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...s. We appreciate contributions of these animals life to research, but we have to do tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reasonable way" with adverb for "reasonable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rches and cruelty if we can use animals in a reasonable way. It would be prospective useful for all...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, i suppose, kind of, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22491349481 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00020553009 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525951557093 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8286263242 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207395989767 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844640806219 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588134958822 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128083827749 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391935883137 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.