Should be studying online the norm?
Some people think that learning online is good but it should be used for specific situations like in the Covid-19 pandemic. Others believe that learning online should be the norm at universities because of its benefits. I disagree with learning online as the norm because studying at university help students gain more things. Learning online should not be the norm at Can Tho university for two reasons.
The first reason is that studying is not only gaining knowledge. Learning at home on the Internet helps students get more information and knowledge but it is not enough. Studying offline helps students get more. They can make friends and build relationships that will make a difference later. Students can understand teamwork and how to work together.
Another reason is that students can not improve their soft skills by learning online. They work together by screen and have difficulty discussing. Because some people choose silence and accept any options without thinking carefully. Moreover, if some arguments happened, some people would hide and avoid giving ideas. It leads to people not learning solving skills and tend to stay away from problems.
Many people think that learning online should be the norm at university. Due to its drawbacks, we have to consider learning online as a serious issue. We can apply that learning online in particular conditions to take advantage of it better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to solve'.
Suggestion: to solve
... ideas. It leads to people not learning solving skills and tend to stay away from probl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 228.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2149122807 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59910889268 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55701754386 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.1128500769 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.9411764706 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4117647059 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52941176471 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334235574261 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114453085549 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142827622007 0.0667982634062 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203901882097 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18553183747 0.056905535591 326% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.