Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Our world is a very diverse place, and not always in a good way. There is a huge disproportion in terms of wealth and resources across different countries, and this state of affairs raises the question whether richer nations should aid those less fortunate or rather let them fight their battle for themselves.
To begin with, each type of people is human being. It would be great as long as the wealthier states could assist to the poor states by providing with free education and food. For example, in Africa the total quantity of famine, deficiency of circumstances and education system has grown up. Additionally, affluent countries should improve the welfare system in order to assist to less fortunate nations. For instance, the wealthiest person Bill Gate donates annualy some fraction of his money for charity.
On the other hand, wealhy people earn that currency fairly and it is not their duty to provide the poor with resources.On the contrary, it is responsibility on government to deal with such internal problems. In particular, Officials could sacrifice by taxing affluents in order to provide the poor citizens with free education and food. As a result, the economy of country would be grown up dramatically.
Furthermore, the result of receiving easy resources, they might abuse the welfare system. For example, in terms of inequality prices of education, the poor whom have free access to schools might ignore the responsibility of studying which leads to exceeding disorder in educational system and curriculum. Therefore, every nation should attempt to eliminate the poor quality by themselves.
Personally, I think that although wealthy nations should not be obliged to help the poorer ones, it seems like the right thing to do. Apart from humanitarian reasons, it can also bring about some political and economic benefits to the donors as they are creating a foundation for future cooperation and potential trade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Jazz 12344 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Bholo | 73 | view |
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 83
- All Mc Donald outlets and other fast food restaurants must be closed down for they sell stomach aggressive foodAgree or disagree? 73
- With the rapid development of communication technology e g smart phones tablets and other mobile devices some people believe that the disadvantages outweigh advantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Millions of people every year move to English-speaking countries such as Australia, Britain or America, in order to study at school, college or university. Why do so many people want to study in English? Why is English such an important international lang 67
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...tries, and this state of affairs raises the question whether richer nations should aid those less fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...duty to provide the poor with resources.On the contrary, it is responsibility on g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, in particular, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1847133758 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81412634245 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614649681529 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2808286718 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.533333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227715951976 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06227620788 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690764257664 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112022652828 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351773597844 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.