Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people consider that there should be changeless type of penalization for each type of criminal offenders. Others, however, debate that taking into consideration al of the circumstances and reasons for committing the crime when determining the punishment would be more fair judgement.
First of all, there are some people who need to nourish their hungry offsprings or someone who must pay for treatment which their households receive and such situations in which the crime has not been done deliberately as the vital needs.
Furthermore, there should be a more humane system in the trial, whether criminal offence was committed by violence or under compulsion. To be more specific, a murder was done for feeding a family or stealing for profit. Therefore, in the court, all of the details and circumstances of crime should be investigated as well as motivation should be taken into consideration before sentencing a criminal.
Secondly, others argue that there must be constant punishment for every lawbreaker in order to never attempt to commit regardless of the crime’s motive. In particular, every citizen would be aware of its severe effects. For instance, In Saudi Arabia robbery is a rare occasion due to fingers of offender being cut that is not significant whether victim is a car or apple.
Additionally, having fixed penalization would definitely diminish the rate of transgression dramatically. As long as individuals cognize about severe consequences of felony, they might be deterred of perpetrating the crime. In short, there would be less concerns from being victim and threat of possession as well as the value of freedom would be a greater extent.
Having inspected both aspects, it appears me that the motivation for perpetrating the transgression must be taken into account and calling the adequate penalization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | olParya | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | tkngan213 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | khanhptk162 | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that computers are more a hindrance than a help in today’s world. Others say that indispensable tools that they would not be able to live or work without them. Discuss. 89
- Today, it is vitally weighty for developing advances in health, education and commerce countries and the affluent countries should engage more responsibility in helping to the poor nations in such areas. 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 84
- Some people feel that it is always wrong to keep animal s in captivity for instance in zoos Other people say that there are benefits for the animals and for humans Discuss both sides of this debate and give your personal view 90
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than theInternational music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ng for profit. Therefore, in the court, all of the details and circumstances of crime shou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun concerns is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ing the crime. In short, there would be less concerns from being victim and threat o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in particular, in short, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33219178082 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09122534628 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8623451886 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.769230769 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491060248083 0.244688304435 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163503966836 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092641783541 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237282229516 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122714779924 0.056905535591 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.