Should zoos be allowed or be banned?
Recently, there has been an ongoing debate over whether zoos should be prohibited or not. This essay will discuss both sides of this critical concern.
Firstly, it is an irrefutable fact that zoos play a salient role in wildlife conservation. To be clearly stated, in natural habitats where the animals are under grave threats from human and meet a profusion of hazards such as being hunted or poached, the extinction is inevitable. For example, it has been asserted that the disappearance of some species namely Java tiger or Spix parrot from all over the world was triggered by natural disasters, which are unavoidable for animals in wild. Secondly, zoos are a flawless place for education. As possessing a variety of animals, zoos can deliver an excessive amount of information as well as provide great chances to meet them in flesh. Not only does it raise the awareness about biodiversity but also gives people some real experiences such as riding horses or milking.
However, caging animals also causes incalculable damage to them. First and foremost, animals living in captivity usually suffer some mental disorders. Because they are not likely to hunt or run as their nature, animals will inhibit profoundly and easily fly into fury, which leads to some psychological diseases as well as their uncontrollable actions. According to the statistic, there has been approximately thousands of animals killing themselves at zoos because they cannot bear these man-made environment. Besides, zoos contribute to destroying animals’ physical health. For example, on average, a lion need to walk more than 10km a day, which the zoo is not likely to satisfy by dint of its camped space.
To sum up, although I agree that zoos have some benefits such as a sanctuary for endangered animals or an ideal place for education, I am also of the opinion that it should be prohibited
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-12 | minh hai | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | chetan03sharma | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | venkatesh1018 | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | Aryun | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-23 | ramakrishna 10 | 89 | view |
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The media should include more stories which report good news To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can be taken to tackle the issue Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experienc 84
- Should zoos be allowed or be banned 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, there has been an ongoing deba...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s both sides of this critical concern. Firstly, it is an irrefutable fact that ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces such as riding horses or milking. However, caging animals also causes inca...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the opinion that it should be prohibited
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07766990291 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79688425873 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62783171521 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6167469692 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195899095702 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656819573064 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813443150817 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141790563762 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562923138595 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.