Smoking causes numerous deaths and requires medical support greatly and It can be curbed by banning. There do exist both advantages and disadvantages of this issue. This essay discusses both positives and negatives of this situation and in furtherance, provides more ways to restrict smoking other than banning it.
To embark on, a primary benefit of regulating smoking is the reduction in cancer cases around the globe. It is a known fact that tobacco has extensive amounts of carcinogenic agents due to which many people fall prey to this fatal disease. As an illustration, many studies confirm that smoking is the most common cause of cancer. As a result, millions lose their life and others become handicapped due to the amputation of cancer-affected body parts.
On the other hand, imposing lifetime restrictions on smoking affects the economy of many nations in the world. As smoking generates great revenue in the form of taxes for the manufacturing and sale of cigarettes, banning it would be a loss to the economic sector. For example, consider poor economies that majorly depend on these tariffs, they will have to face severe consequences income generated due to smoking is halted. The outcome is the increased cess on other commodities to nullify this loss.
Although the ban is one way to fight smoking, there are other effective ways too. It can also be dealt with by raising awareness among the people that are habituated to it and this is possible by campaigning the gnarly effects of tobacco on the human body. For example, cigarette consumption in many regions has been decreased significantly since the advertising of ill effects they cause. Thus, the number of people who are into this grim habit will eventually decrease.
in conclusion, although the smoking ban helps reducing cancer it will affect the economical affairs of many countries. other than banning it can also be combated by educating the consumers regarding its dangerous influence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consequences'' or 'consequence's'?
Suggestion: consequences'; consequence's
...e tariffs they will have to face severe consequences income generated due to smoking is halt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 46, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...nclusion although the smoking ban helps reducing cancer it will affect the economical af...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...elps reducing cancer it will affect the economical affairs of many countries other than ba...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06832298137 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73917268738 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 322.0 20.2975951904 1586% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1632.0 106.682146367 1530% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 322.0 20.7667163134 1551% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 89.0 7.06120827912 1260% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18176662811 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18176662811 0.084324248473 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103556627161 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130266189351 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 163.4 13.0946893788 1248% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -255.35 50.2224549098 -508% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 128.9 11.3001002004 1141% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.61 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.41 8.58950901804 284% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 130.8 10.1190380762 1293% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.7795591182 538% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.