Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Nowadays, Smoking in many places is not unusual for teenagers between ages 16-18. Sometimes they might not recognize how to smoke appropriately in the right position. It has been a great issue in the environment and social as well as stopping people often breaking the smoking policy is such a big work.
I completely agree with this statement that smoking in collective places such as a park and tourist attraction must be discontinued because this significant action is the cause of cancer and disease, Besides individuals standing close to smokers can receive some disadvantages of passive-smoking. In my home country. Thailand, there has been a number of patients smelling the smoke of cigarettes come to the hospital to check up their respiratory system. The authorities have to be responsible to manage the actions with proper procedure, otherwise the situation may get slightly worse.
To sum up, it would be better if men and women respect the reasonable conditions by ending their smoking habits in public areas, on the other hand, they can find any public smoking areas to smoke fluently without concern about the restrictions.
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV Therefore they are encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledg 84
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, look, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94267515924 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19131958133 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7642633775 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.4 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255804211132 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079159075592 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652660856861 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154559703697 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051461983975 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.