Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they are encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is inevitable that TV has become increasingly common to juveniles in today’s digital age. A host of people advocate the idea of permitting children to watch TV both at home and at institutions to enhance their learning progress. Although this view is rather reasonable, its drawbacks seem to be far more significant.
Encouraging children to watch TV is conducive to their development. In fact, thanks to the proliferation of technological devices and internet platforms, numerous videos are now accessible to children around the globe just at the click of a button.Therefore, in comparison to tedious complicated academic lessons at school, these educational videos could quickly capture their attention, which means that they could take in knowledge more effectively and enthusiastically. For instance, a host of juveniles are immensely fluent in foreign languages thanks to the early exposure to stimulating music videos on youtube, which seems to be a better way to learn a new language than traditional methods.
However, spending too much time on TV might induce side effects on children’s learning progress. In fact, since kids’ videos possess attractive visual effects and catchy melodies, juveniles frequently binge-watch all day which means they might lose track of time and forget such priorities as learning. As they devote less time to studying, their academic performance would be severely affected, which means they would not be armed with sufficient academic knowledge and qualifications to land decent jobs down the road.
Furthermore, abusing television could also pose harm to children's health. In fact, a variety of juveniles, by excessively immersing themselves in television screens, end up encountering several health problems such as diabetes and short-sightedness due to the deprivation of regular vigorous physical exercises. This might be even exacerbated when they grow older, which seems to be a great disadvantage in comparison to the healthy bodies of active children.
In conclusion, although watching TV is conducive to children’s learning, it still has several negative impacts. Therefore, parents should set a reasonable screen time limit to ensure their offspring balance between physical activities and watching TV
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-30 | pinkwar123 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Oliviachenlu | 81 | view |
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledg 84
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV Therefore they are encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...the globe just at the click of a button.Therefore, in comparison to tedious complicated a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to progress'
Suggestion: to progress
...uce side effects on children’s learning progress. In fact, since kids’ videos possess at...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons to land decent jobs down the road. Furthermore, abusing television could al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62390670554 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23754074143 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609329446064 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.9282232789 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.785714286 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273543757821 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10203436546 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974789872286 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154577927271 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667567440682 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.