social networks
With social media growing at an extremely fast speed, the information each user consumes and transmits has become a major point of concern. Many argue that to benefit the whole community, each of its citizens must regard what they post on social networks in a responsible manner. I completely agree with this statement for several reasons.
First of all, it is obvious that digital items shared via social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, can have realistic impacts. The world has witnessed various serious incidents caused by seemingly harmless information spreading through their mobile devices. For example, during the outbreak of the new corona virus, some people took advantage of the frightened public and posted fake news on their accounts to attract views and attention, many of them tried to excuse their wrongdoing as “just a joke”, at the expense of truthful reporting. Consequently, this has caused unnecessary confusion for all citizens about what was happening and hindered the government’s effort to control the viral outbreak.
Second, holding yourself accountable for what you share on your social media is ultimately beneficial for maintaining a healthy and positive image. Social media have become so popular that in many cases, an employer may consider the content found on your account when deciding whether you are a suitable candidate. Besides, your family members, friends, together with everyone in your network, will be likely to refer to your activities on your social networks to draw conclusions about who you are. Thus, being responsible for what you post on such platforms is also being responsible for how you portray yourself in front of others.
Many may argue that since the information is only displayed digitally on a small screen, it is not worth being considered a real threat in any case. However, these people fail to take into consideration how fast such content can be transmitted from devices to devices, thus reaching a large group of people almost instantly. While there has been legislation trying to control toxic information from being uploaded and spreading, it has never proven to be enough. All social network users themselves must be the first to treat digital materials with a sense of responsibility and virtue.
All in all, I agree strongly that all social media users must be responsible for everything they upload on their digital networks to benefit society as well as themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | view | |
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | view | |
| 2024-03-18 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-24 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a responsible manner" with adverb for "responsible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...egard what they post on social networks in a responsible manner. I completely agree with this statement...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
...u portray yourself in front of others. Many may argue that since the information is onl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, however, may, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, first of all, in any case, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24747474747 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74802244986 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0865625786 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238655918506 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839438131809 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995795576399 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151035800074 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680578535749 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.