Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion

In the recent years, due to multiple causes like natural disasters, water shortages, starvation our planet is suffering from lot of hazards which are ultimately affecting our mankind. Here comes the most important role played by charitable trusts. Many people are in two minds regarding the help and support offered by this kind of trusts. In my opinion, these organizations should reach to as many people as possible. My justification is discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
Addressing the former view, the prime motto of this trusts is to help poor and under-privlage population. The "men made" boundries should not be a barrier when it comes to support needy people. Now a days, many young volunteers would love to participate in this generous work without expecting any money or rewards. In this way, the work and enthusiasm become double for the people who actually want to do something for the society. Moreover, this kind of trusts are usually located in well-known and rich nations where everything is redially available and probably they are not right candidates. For an instance, African states are the most vulnerable ones due to wide variety of issues they are facing currently.
Discussing the latter opinion, according to the most famous proverb "Charity should begin from home". This means that unless and until if our own country is suffering from some dangerous triumphs, there is no valid reason one should look out to help others. Furthermore, these local trusts are now liable to get international funding easily due to globalization. Hence once the quality of lifestyle of domestic population improves, this will ultimately lead one country to run better.
To sum up with, every human being is valid to receive support whenever needed, no matter of physical barriers or boundries. Thus, the organizations should expand their horizons and reach to maximum needy communities as possible.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 48, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ing the former view, the prime motto of this trusts is to help poor and under-privla...
^^^^
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion. The 'men made' boundries should not be a barrier when it comes to...
^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
... when it comes to support needy people. Now a days, many young volunteers would love to pa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...n it comes to support needy people. Now a days, many young volunteers would love to pa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...al funding easily due to globalization. Hence once the quality of lifestyle of domest...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26948051948 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85911052375 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9204244146 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179667974326 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524246704872 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448091752107 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102069760908 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187959898654 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.