Some believe it is more important for cities and towns to invest heavily in building large outdoor public spaces. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, some goverments prioritize substantial urban development in terms of providing green spaces and recreational facilities. Allocating a large amount of budget to establishing these places has been subject to debate. While many people do not feel the necessity of spending money on constructing outdoor facilities, I contend that this policy is beneficial for both people and government.
On one hand, the critics of investing enormous amount of money in oudoor public spaces argue that it is not a smart strategy for urban managment and other sections should be regarded as well. In other words, it is undeniable that transportation infrustructure, health care system and educational institutions, for example, play a vital role in urban development. For achieving a developed city or town, therefore, financial managment and prioritizing the importance of measures should be taken into account.
On the other hand, I agree with proponants of major investment in outdoor public spaces who assert that these areas serve as a communal hub for people and has a significant impact on improving cultural and educational aspects of individuals life. This means that in these places people from diverse backgrounds can share their experiences through social intractions which can lead to fostering a sense of unity among them. Moreover, these foundations can be symbols of modernity and growth which can attract tourist from other parts of the world and becom a source of income.
In conclusion, budget managment in providing outdoor public spaces has always been a controversial issue among authorities and population. While many individuals advocate spending money on other infrustructures and rank the services based on level of importance, I believe that emphasizing construction of these social hubs can be beneficial in terms of improving cohision in society and financial gains
- In many countries people now wear western style dresses such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Many scientists believe that now we can study the behavior of a three years old child to see whether they will grow up to be criminals To what extend do you think crime is determined by human nature Is it possible to stop children from going up to be crim 84
- Some countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world To what extent is this a positive or negative trend 78
- In many countries people now wear western style dresses such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some countries invest in specialized sports facilities for top athletes but not for the average people Is this a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49657534247 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11779099052 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571917808219 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3176360112 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.909090909 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175266007812 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650257166909 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492923758002 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100255099536 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267264040299 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.